persuasion-taxonomy

Tools

9 tools: 9 read-only, 0 change data, 0 high risk (delete, pay, send or run code).

No tool name points to sending messages.

read-only

Only reads or looks things up. Safe for an agent to call on its own.

changes data

Creates, edits or sends something. Worth a person's approval the first time.

high risk

Can delete, pay, send on your behalf or run code. Hard or impossible to undo.

Connecting costs an agent about 6,422 tokens of tool definitions and a 270 ms handshake.

• read-onlyplan_marketing_copyPlan any piece of marketing copy before you write it, whether it's an ad, a landing page, a sales page or sales letter, an email, a subject line, a social post, a headline or a video script. Give it the goal, the reader and the offer, and it tells you which of the nine questions every reader sile...
• read-onlydiagnose_marketing_copyReview, critique or roast any piece of marketing copy, whether it's an ad, a landing page, an email, a sales page, a social post or a script, and find out why it might not persuade. Before you call it, read the copy and label each line with the one reader question it mainly answers, quoting the w...
• read-onlyexplain_why_not_convertingWork out why an ad, a landing page, an email or a whole funnel isn't converting. Start from what you can see. Maybe people don't click (a low CTR), or they click and bounce, or they read and don't buy. Maybe they abandon the checkout or the form, the leads never buy, customers buy once and leave,...
• read-onlyfind_persuasion_techniquesSearch the Persuasion Taxonomy, 766 named persuasion techniques documented from real advertising and organized by the nine reader questions they answer. Describe what you want the copy to do, like build trust without testimonials, create urgency without fake scarcity, handle a price objection, ma...
• read-onlyget_persuasion_techniqueLook up one persuasion technique by its ID (like PT-PRV-10000), its slug or its name. You get the full definition, why it works, when it lands and when it backfires, real examples from advertising, related and opposite techniques, and a link you can cite. Use it before you apply or recommend a te...
• read-onlycheck_headlinesCheck headlines, email subject lines, ad openings, video hooks, social post openings and first lines, and compare options against each other. For each line it tells you whether the line does its job in that spot, meaning which of the nine reader questions it answers, and whether a competitor coul...
• read-onlycheck_marketing_claimsCheck whether marketing claims and calls to action are specific enough to believe. It catches the vague superlative, like "the best" or "#1", that readers discount on sight. It catches promises with no proof behind them and results with no mechanism, and it flags the generic buttons everyone uses...
• read-onlyplan_ab_testPlan an A/B test for marketing copy. Give it the current conversion rate, the smallest lift worth detecting and the daily traffic, and it tells you how many visitors each version needs and how many days to run. It also frames the test as two different answers to the same reader question, so the r...
• read-onlyread_ab_test_resultRead the result of an A/B test. You get each version's conversion rate and lift, whether the difference is statistically significant, the confidence interval, and the chance each version really beats the original. It also warns you about the things that make a test result lie. Those include too f...

Levels are automated estimates from each tool's public name, description and annotations, and can be wrong. Descriptions as the server publishes them.

Status

Newest check: answered with tools, from the daily check, 2026-10-05, 270 ms.

From one check a day over the last 1 day. Servers whose owner verified them are checked every 5 minutes. Sign-in and payment answers count as up.

Last 30 days

2026-09-062026-10-05

answered with toolssign-in or payment askednot answeringnot checked

Compare: the most reliable servers in Marketing, email and messaging, ranked by days answering.

What agents looked for

This week agents asked 7Maps for marketing, email and messaging servers 1 time; this server was shown 0 times and picked 0 times.

Owners see the keywords, the servers picked instead, failure reasons and a comparison with similar servers in Owner Insights.

Badge

Live: status, days reachable, the tokens its tool list costs an agent. For a README:

[![7Maps](https://7it.co.il/7maps/badge/taxonomy.coppica.com/mcp.svg)](https://7it.co.il/7maps/s/taxonomy.coppica.com/mcp)

Other styles: add ?style=uptime (30-day uptime), ?style=stars (agents’ rating) or ?style=verified (owner mark) to the image address, or ?style=top (shows "top 10%" when the server ranks in the top tenth of its category by days answering; otherwise the standard badge).

Is this badge genuine? Anyone can check what a genuine badge for this server says right now: /7maps/verify/badge?server=taxonomy.coppica.com%2Fmcp (add the same &style= for another style).

Own this server? Verify that it is yours.

Status widget

A live status card for a status page, docs or a dashboard: current status, the 30-day strip, uptime and handshake time.

Script (renders where it is placed, in its own shadow DOM):

<script src="https://7it.co.il/7maps/widget/taxonomy.coppica.com/mcp.js" async></script>

Or an iframe:

<iframe src="https://7it.co.il/7maps/widget/taxonomy.coppica.com/mcp" title="7Maps status" width="360" height="176" style="border:0;max-width:100%" loading="lazy"></iframe>

The widget is drawn only from 7it.co.il. Is a status shown elsewhere genuine? Check it: /7maps/verify/badge?server=taxonomy.coppica.com%2Fmcp.

Add ?theme=light or ?theme=dark to either address (default: follows the visitor's setting). Refreshed every 5 minutes. Open the card · script.

For AI agents

Before connecting, an agent can ask 7Maps for this server's full condition, every tool's risk level and what changed since a person approved it: the road_conditions, watch and route tools on https://7it.co.il/7maps/mcp, paid per call in USDC via x402. About 7Maps.